Jokers to the Right.com: Seven Answers from Michael Crichton

« Home | How President Eisenhower Solved the Illegal Immigr... » | On Impeachment » | Happiness is Jim Webb's Gun » | Hero/Hack » | Quote of the Week » | SB5: Attack of the Clones & The Spirit of HB 76 » | Review: Rush Single "Far Cry" » | CPAC & The State of Conservatism » | The Gospel of John and Yoko? » | Stephenson on 300 »

Seven Answers from Michael Crichton

Read the whole interview here. This is just an excerpt.

On global warming:

There has been so much disinformation about my position that I feel obliged to repeat what I said in my book. Yes, the globe is warming; the greenhouse effect is real; CO2 is a greenhouse gas; it is increasing from human activities; we would expect this increased CO2 to produce warming. All true.

But nothing in this sequence of statements implies that CO2 is the primary driver of the warming we are seeing. Not at all. It is one thing to say that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and is therefore causing warming; it is quite another to say CO2 is causing ALL of the warming that we see. There is good evidence (and good physical theory) for the first statement, and weak evidence, primarily computer models, for the second.

In response to "What is the most serious threat facing our civilisation?"

Loss of classical liberal values in those western societies that embraced them.

England was the first modern state, the first superpower, the first nation to deal with moral issues around the world, and the first nation to install the benefits of what we might now loosely term a liberal society. I mean that in the 19th century sense of liberalism. That notion of liberalism was also present in America, but made it to the Continent only in a pale and limited form. It is a wonderful social conception that must be vigilantly guarded. It is not shared by other nations in the world. Nor is it shared by many citizens in English-speaking countries. Peculiarly, many of our most educated citizens are least sympathetic to classical liberal ideals. Indeed the term 'liberalism' in the modern day has come to imply a constellation of attitudes that John Stuart Mill would not recognize as liberal at all. Nor would, say, John F. Kennedy recognize them as liberal. Kennedy's conception of liberalism was simultaneously more tolerant and more tough-minded: tolerant about varieties of behavior within the society, and tough-minded toward threats to a tolerant society from without.

That's all gone, now. Today there is far too much sensitivity within societies, and too little hard-nosed recognition of threats from without. We are inclined to be intolerant of speech by our friends and neighbors, and tolerant of beheadings, rape, and homophobia in distant lands.

This makes no sense. But here we are.

Crichton is a guy who really gets it. I've been a fan of his books since I first discovered Jurassic Park, and over the past two years have come to have the utmost respect for his opinions.

Labels: , ,

| |

About me

  • I'm Ryan S.
  • From University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
My profile
Powered by Blogger


This Blog Best Viewed Using:
Get Firefox!