Jokers to the Right.com

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Open Letter to Esteemed Members of Government in the State of Delaware

Fellow blogger and teacher Mike McKain sends along this letter:

Open Letter to Esteemed Members of Government in the State of Delaware:



In these dark and dismal financial times, it is with great understanding and concern that I write to you on the critical topic of education in the state of Delaware. As a teacher in the Seaford School District, I know first hand the importance and struggles that our youth and, consequently, their teachers face on a daily basis. It is with this in mind that I write to urge you to protect our vulnerable youth, their teachers, and education as a whole from suffering the consequences of our state’s fiscal strife.



I know education represents a huge portion of our state’s budget and understand that some programming cuts will be necessary. As a teacher of social studies, I understand that some sacrifices are necessary in troubled times and indeed welcome the opportunity to fulfill my civic duties. That said, the current budget proposal includes an 8% cut to education funding, translating directly to hundreds of teaching positions lost across the state with a particularly difficult burden falling on the poorest of districts, including Seaford, Laurel, and Woodbridge.



The consequences of such cuts would be catastrophic to both the students who these districts serve and to the state of education in Delaware as a whole. Disenchanted young teachers, many of whom have recently completed ever-improving college programs and thus have strong backgrounds in both content and modern educational theory, will flee the state or leave the profession entirely as job security is ordinarily one of the few financial benefits to teaching. With a large number of retirees expected in the next five years, this could leave a vacuum in critical content areas in districts statewide. Moreover, in poorer districts such as Seaford and Laurel, these cuts will take away middle class jobs and families, presenting further challenges to already struggling local economies.



Perhaps most alarming about the proposed cuts is their potential impact on students, who represent the future of our state and the reason teachers practice their art in the first place. With cuts at each school, class sizes would balloon, after school programs that provide extra help would be eliminated, and mentors would be lost. Students would lose opportunities to develop personal relationships with teachers, which often serve as a guiding beacon through graduation and help to keep troubled youths on track. Achievement would inherently decline on DSTP and all other indicators; increasing numbers of children would be left behind as teachers struggled just to manage classrooms and implement assessments.



Such immediate consequences would be felt for years and possibly generations to come. Unemployed teachers would draw on the state, collecting unemployment and requiring other government assistance to provide for their young families. This would also further diminish the income tax base long term; a teacher who loses his or her job is initially trained or prepared for few other positions in the professional world. Increased student failures and drop outs would further depress struggling communities, in all likelihood raising crime rates or, at the very least, increasing the burden on the state as another generation of undereducated and unprepared youths enters the workforce.



While we in the education field sympathize with the financial emergency Delaware currently faces, taking from our children, our future, will in no way improve the situation in the long run. Indeed, it is the surest way to drive the state into depression and our communities into abysmal failure. Education brings with it the hope for a better tomorrow; increased student learning and achievement corresponds to better days ahead, to a new morning in Delaware and across America. A “small” 8% cut, translating to hundreds of critical teaching jobs, only leads us down a dark and dangerous path for our youth and, consequently, for our future.



Thank you for your time.



Sincerely,



Michael D. McKain

Teacher, Seaford School District

Labels:

Saturday, April 12, 2008

How to Fight a Budget Crisis: Steal from Children

That's exactly what the state of Delaware and the Minner-Carney administration plan to do:
Delawareonline:
Hundreds of teachers could be laid off, students may not get new textbooks and after-school programs could be cut if public schools across the state have to implement the most severe education budget cut in more than a decade.

Jennifer "JJ" Davis, director of the state Office of Management and Budget, has asked the state's 19 district superintendents and 17 charter school leaders to identify 8 percent of their budgets that could be cut for fiscal year 2009, which starts July 1. Davis also asked elected officials, state agency directors, higher-education institutions and all Cabinet secretaries to identify 8 percent cuts for the coming fiscal year.

In March, the Office of Management and Budget asked every state agency to return to the state a collective $100 million to $150 million from their current fiscal-year budgets because of revenue shortfalls. Public schools were exempt from that request, but after the Delaware Economic and Financial Advisory Council announced last month that projected revenues for the current fiscal year will come up $126 million short, with a $200 million shortfall projected for next fiscal year, public education had to be part of the solution, Davis said.

The General Assembly has to find $250 million to cut from the entire state budget -- of which one-third belongs to public education, Davis said.

Therefore, the Department of Education, school districts and charter schools must identify a collective $85 million to cut.

. . .

And when personnel is the largest part of every district's budget, layoffs are likely, many district superintendents said.

In Christina, the state's largest district, principals held meetings with their staff this week to inform them of potential cuts.

"We were told that there will be about 120 teachers laid off. There won't be any summer school or any after-school programs for extra help and tutoring," said Paul Sedacca, a fourth-grade teacher at McVey Elementary School.

"The first answer everyone has is to lay off the teachers," he said. "Laying off more people is like a Band-Aid. That will work for now but not for the long term."

Teachers aren't the only ones who could lose their jobs. Positions ranging from secretary and custodian to paraprofessional are at risk.
This is an outrage. What about all those trips abroad Minner made? Where else can the state cut from?

Robbing kids of teachers and music, art, and after-school program is unacceptable. Someone should strike over this.

Labels: ,

Monday, September 24, 2007

A Time to Serve?

I was perusing a couple-weeks-old copy of TIME magazine today because the cover story caught my eye, a 21st century Rosie the Riveter (see right) representing the magazine's call-to-arms that there need to be new national service initiatives.

I'm not necessarily opposed to these initiatives, which range from yet another "Fill-in-the-blank Corps" organization to "baby bonds" to a national service academy patterned after West Point.

I am however, certainly opposed to this kind of service if it is compulsory. We don't live in a society like Starship Troopers, and so compulsory service is highly contrarian to the American Republican idea.

The government has an obvious benefit to itself to support both military and non-military service, and there are ways to encourage that beyond a compulsory system. The most obvious one to me is an entirely revamped GI Bill that not only takes care of our veterans with college education and access to loans to start businesses or purchase homes, but provides similar access to those who elect to serve in the USA Freedom Corps (one of the least-remembered Bush initiatives, and a pretty good one).

Some of the suggestions in the article are asinine at best (like turning national service into a Cabinet-level department), but it is worth reading. The infrastructure is there, but a national campaign, focused on college campuses, would go a long way to encourage my generation to step up in to the plate even more than we already have.

Labels:

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Steve Jobs: Anti-Union Warriror

Wired:

The teachers' unions, Jobs believes, are ruining America's schools because they prevent bad teachers from being fired.

"I believe that what is wrong with our schools in this nation is that they have become unionized in the worst possible way," Jobs told a school reform conference in Texas on Saturday. "This unionization and lifetime employment of K-12 teachers is off-the-charts crazy."

and

Jobs has also been a long-time advocate of a school voucher system, another ridiculous idea based on the misplaced faith that the mythical free market will fix schools by giving parents choice.

Jobs argues that vouchers will allow parents, the "customers," to decide where to send their kids to school, and the free market will sort it out. Competition will spur innovation, improve quality and drive bad schools (and bad teachers) out of business. The best schools will thrive.

If you ignore Leander Kahney's pro-union, pro-government schools bias, you see that Jobs has, at the least, libertarian leanings. Pretty cool, huh?

Labels:

Saturday, February 10, 2007

Paternal Street

Mayor Street of my hometown, Philadelphia, has just signed a new ordinance expanding the city's curfew. Since apparently parents don't carte about their kids, it is up to the mayor to be there for them:
''Young people do not belong on the street at 11 and 12 o'clock at night,'' Mayor Street said in a statement released following a bill signing ceremony. ''No good things can happen to young people at that hour.''
Part of the reasoning is to reduce youth violence, and part is for anti-truancy:
''If we keep them off the street and get them back in school, we will be a safer community,'' he said.
Now that seems like a dumb thing to say given the state of Philadelphia schools. There are schools in Philadelphia that are about as unsafe as the streets. There is no discipline, and therefore the "problem" kids are just ushered through. Maybe if parents were encouraged to take responsibility for their kids, we wouldn't need government paternalism.

Labels: ,

About me

  • I'm Ryan S.
  • From University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States
My profile